Skip to main content
UrbanVakeel
Live wire
SCC OnlineKnow Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice K.V. Viswanathan’s Legacy & Prominent JudgmentsThe HinduSupreme Court to examine if law is diluting India’s wetland countBar and BenchSupreme Court stays Delhi HC direction allowing law students with low attendance to sit for examsThe Diplomat – Asia-PacificA High Court in India Recognizes Yet Another Disputed Site as a Hindu TempleDrishti IASSupreme Court’s Revival of Sedition TrialsDevdiscourseSupreme Court Stays Delhi High Court's Verdict on Mandatory Attendance in Law CollegesMoneycontrol.comOPINION | Women High Court judges who redefined India’s constitutional and judicial landscapeFACTLYWomen in India’s Decision-Making Roles: Progress, But Uneven GainsDown To EarthSupreme Court’s new push on solid waste management: Are states ready for a new era of waste governance?Health Policy WatchMore Girls Will Finish School if India’s Supreme Court Ruling on Menstrual Health is ImplementedSCC Online“NTA has not learnt its lesson yet”: Supreme Court issues notice to NTA in NEET Paper Leak caseThe New Indian ExpressSC issues notice to Centre regarding vacancies in Income Tax Appellate TribunalBar and BenchVyapak Desai joins 4 Pump Court as an Associate MemberFrontline MagazineSupreme Court Hate Speech Ruling Exposes India’s Legal GapsSCC OnlineSC: Deadline extended for application to Entry-Level Judiciary Exams till further orders | SCC Times

Business Law

Cheque Bounce Under Section 138: A Complete Guide

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act criminalises cheque dishonour for insufficient funds. The procedure is technical and the timeline is unforgiving.


By Editorial Desk1 min read
Bounced cheque and bank slip
Bounced cheque and bank slip

Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are technically criminal, but they function more like a debt-recovery mechanism. The Act builds in multiple notice and timeline requirements; missing any of them is fatal.

The mandatory timeline

  1. Cheque presented within validity (3 months from date of cheque)

  2. Cheque returned dishonoured by the bank

  3. Demand notice sent within 30 days of receiving the dishonour memo

  4. Drawer has 15 days to pay after notice

  5. Complaint must be filed within 30 days of expiry of the 15-day window

Essential elements

  • The cheque was issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt

  • The cheque was presented within validity

  • The cheque was dishonoured for insufficient funds or arrangement

  • Demand notice was served properly

  • The drawer failed to pay within 15 days

Common defences

The accused often raises that the cheque was given as security, that there was no consideration, or that the cheque was issued under coercion. Recent Supreme Court decisions have clarified the presumption under Section 139 — the cheque is presumed to be for a legally enforceable debt unless the accused proves otherwise.

The 30-day window for sending the demand notice is the most commonly missed deadline. Once missed, the cause of action under Section 138 is permanently lost.

The Brief · daily newsletter

One short legal explainer in your inbox, every weekday morning.

Continue reading